It boils down does common(yours) morality allow deceit or violence under this situation. There are similar arguments for revolutionary and violent variations as well. It is not really required under many definitions.Įllmann states that covert lawbreaking is just valid way of expressing your morality ( ideology ) as public disobedience. ![]() I am talking about the conventionally held definition of Civil Disobedience, non-violent and public are generally accepted qualifiers. Money, Ideology and Ego are voluntary, Coercion is forced is the idea i believe. Coercion in the context of leak (MI CE) usually is understood as unwilling participant who is being blackmailed to leak. King actually frames civil disobedience as the expression of highest respect for the law.Īll behavior is motivated by either seeking gratification/pleasure or for avoiding pain, however such a reductive mental model is not useful work with in this context. Thoreau's seminal essay or Gandhi or King's(and many others) writings talk about the topic in length. Even when refusing to follow a specific law you still follow the Law, the point is that you willingly accept the consequence of your (in)action as per that law, i.e. ![]() ![]() If refusing to obey laws for ideological reasons they are doing some form of civil disobedience, that is still obeying the "law".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |